THE LIGHT OF ANDAMANS | VOL 36 | ISSUE 03 | 01 NOV 2012
Interview:
Jalaj Srivastava,
Principal Secretary, Shipping, Planning and
Revenue
MF Samson is a Disaster: Jalaj
Capt
Seshasai is learnt to have been repatriated after the corruption charges
against him. Will the buck stop at him or are there more people involved?
We are fully aware of many issues during the
period of Capt Seshasai, but his repatriation was purely an administrative
decision, nothing to do with corruption charges. The Director was not
technically competent to take major decisions on procurement. Most of the
administrative decisions taken by the Director were also not very sound. The
file on corruption charges is with Secretary Vigilance.
Anyway, there is no attempt to protect Capt
Seshasai. As far as I know, he is fully trapped. I have learnt that there are
more than 4 people whose name features in the charge sheet. We have already
shunted some of them out of DSS.
There are many decisions, where Seshasai has
taken us for a ride. MF Samsun is a disaster. We were fooled by Capt Seshasai.
The contract was given to Shipping Corporation of India . Capt Seshasai co-opted and
went and made a very bad selection. The whole selection process was flawed. It
was purely a "swayamvar." The
L1 ship was rejected on whimsical reasons. There was no comparative statement.
Moreover, we were time and again told by Capt Seshasai that it's a 600-pax
ship, whereas, I had personally asked Secretary to count and found out that it
can only accommodate 344 and odd passengers. We are paying about Rs 9 lakh for
a 40-year old ship, which cannot run on its optimum speed. The air-conditioning
shuts down if it's run on designed speed more than 11 knots. We are planning to
immediately send the ship back.
DSS
is the second largest fleet after SCI. But we don't possess Document of
Compliance. There are so many issues with the Regulatory bodies. Why is DSS not
upgraded into Shipping Corporation? Why Shipping is missing from the IDA
agenda?
During the recent visit of Minister of
Shipping, all these issues came up for discussion. He has assured that for the liaison issues
with SCI, DG Shipping, MMD and IRS, there will be a high-powered committee. It
will be headed with Jt Secretary Shipping and from our side; person incharge of
Shipping will attend the meetings. The first meeting of the Committee was held
on 16 Oct, in which Secretary, Shipping too attended in which three issues were
broadly decided - strengthening of port management and infrastructure, the
Ministry of Shipping will ensure that all Govt institutions like IRS, MMD, DG
Shipping and SCI will upgrade their facilities here. Two Chief Engineer-level
persons from SCI will be posted here. We don't have to send all papers to
Kolkata to IRS as they will have full-fledged office here itself.
As majority of issues have been already
sorted, it does not feature in the agenda of Standing Committee of IDA. On the
morning of 17 Oct, Secretary, Planning Commission also took a meeting in which
many other issues related with Shipping came up for discussion. We hope that
the high-powered committee is the answer to many of our problems.
Moreover, the Standing Committee Meeting of
IDA is held only once a year, and the IDA meeting in two years. What we should
do is most of the issues we are fighting should be taken up in the monitoring
committee under Planning Commission, which meets more frequently.
Why
the Admn does not consult anybody before the agenda for IDA is finalized?
You are right. There should have been an all
party meeting, PRIs and other civil society organizations before the IDA agenda
is taken to Planning Commission. Even
public spirited citizens can give their viewpoint. But we have seen that the
last IDA meeting began and ended with a fiasco. In the agenda we had listed
outstanding issues, tourism policy, Jarawa policy and suggestions of the MP.
But, time did not permit to address all issues.
Why
issues like waiving off of Rapid EIA for bathrooms, changing rooms and wayside
amenities feature in IDA meetings? Is it not frivolous? Why can't such issues
be sorted out at local level?
It's not a frivolous matter. The Dept of
Environment and Forest has been creating
hurdles at every stage. The Ministry of
Environment and Forests have taken a stand that even such minor issues should
go to their standing committee. Since we have formed ANCZMA, all such issues
should be sorted out at Chief Secretary Level. For instance, the Lieutenant
Governor had sent a communication regarding a clearance to MoEF almost a year
ago. But, MoEF denies saying that they have not received the letter. Even
Shashi Kumar, PCCF said that he had sent it eleven months ago. Now, when such
discussions come up at IDA meeting, it shows the apathy of MoEF.
What
is the status of quarry auctioning? Do you think auction can rationalize the
price of end-products?
In the last week a lot has happened. The
auction notice for quarry sites is already out. The royalty has been revised
from Rs 1.77 per cbm to Rs 5 per cbm. If we had increased it further, it would
have become a reason to hike the price of end-product. It is the prerogative of
the quarry owners; however, he cannot hike the price which is beyond the reach
of common people. We need to look into this.